May 12 felt like a coordinated ambush. I had just finalized and served my Record on Appeal, filed a Motion to Identify the judicial panel behind recent appellate rulings, and submitted a formal Notice objecting to the record’s prior rejection—all actions taken in good faith to preserve my appellate rights and expose procedural manipulation. But that afternoon, I discovered three new entries had silently appeared on the public docket, and none had been served on me. At 9:26 a.m., the court stamped an order denying my Ex Parte TRO—no findings, no reasoning, just a rubber-stamped rejection. Then, ten minutes later, at 9:36 a.m., another order appeared—one I didn’t even know existed until hours later when I manually checked the docket. That order struck my entire Record on Appeal. It was not emailed. It wasn’t even available to download , which shows intentional concealment as it’s required to be available. The Certificate of Service showed it had been mailed to my former address that I don’t even get forwarded mail from and to Anna—not to Yopp, her attorney—violating service rules and bypassing proper notice entirely. The court had already mailed notices to my current address so this was intentional.
The concealment felt intentional. I emailed the Trial Court Administrator immediately who said she had nothing to do with it and cc’d the clerks in charge. No one responded. Then at 5:01 p.m., the Court of Appeals, despite never having docketed my appeal and with no legal authority to act, granted Yopp’s retroactive extension to settle the record—more than 30 days late, under a closed writ docket, and without even citing a valid reason. One minute later, they denied my Motion to Strike his improper filing.
Let me be clear: under controlling law, the appellate court had no authority to rule on anything until the appeal was formally entered. That hadn’t happened. They so much case law on this. They also issued it under a closed writ and 30 days pass deadline. The Court of Appeals is bounded by rules – that is the whole point of the court. This makes no logical sense. This means either Clerk Soar is funneling rulings without judicial oversight, Yopp has backdoor influence, or the Court is issuing fraudulent orders . Any of these scenarios is fraud upon the court and is subject to criminal prosecution. I filed a motion to identify the judges to show for the record they are refusing to provide the names.
The next day, I emailed again about the concealed strike order. Yopp responded first—suspiciously stating there was no such order striking the Certificate of Service and sharing what “he assumed” the order was. How would he know that unless he had inside information? I asked him directly whether he had been tipped off. Dina Griffith from the clerk’s office then claimed the order had always been viewable, yet didn’t address then why it was it was mailed improperly. If this was true they would have responded the day prior and simply stated that. The order was then of course available to download and I confirmed what I feared: the order, signed by Judge Eagles, wiped out my entire supplemental record, which contained clear documentation of judicial misconduct. She had no authority to do that. Her order had been signed hours before the appellate ruling, yet deliberately withheld until after it posted—almost like they were trying to shape the appellate outcome before it could be challenged.
This wasn’t just procedural error. It was calculated suppression and there are too many violations to even list them all.