On June 24, I submitted two separate formal oversight requests—one at the state level and one at the federal level—each addressing ongoing misconduct in a distinct case.
First, I sent a comprehensive email to the North Carolina House Oversight Committee, House Judiciary 1 Committee, and Senate Judiciary Committee detailing what I believe to be procedural fraud and judicial misconduct at the North Carolina Court of Appeals. I laid out specific allegations against Clerk Eugene Soar for issuing unauthorized orders, withholding judge names in violation of public records law, and allowing a pattern of misrepresentation and case manipulation to continue unchecked. I also stated I have evidence of fee overcharges from a review of over 200 appellate filings and described my experience of retaliatory treatment and verbal abuse, despite having followed every procedural rule. The email included links to my public judicial log, my website timeline, and my latest YouTube video to ensure full transparency. I requested a formal inquiry, a public hearing, and the immediate release of judicial names as required by law.
Separately, I sent a second letter to the United States House Judiciary Committee and Rep. Valerie Foushee requesting emergency intervention in my federal civil rights case in the Middle District. I described how my Rule 59(e) motion for emergency injunctive relief has been pending for nearly a month without ruling, while I continue to suffer harm due to the denial of electronic filing access. I explained that my ADA-based CM/ECF access requests have been denied three times without justification, forcing me to incur nearly $500 in printing and courier costs just to maintain participation. I emphasized that the court’s refusal to act is not only discriminatory in effect, but strategically advantageous to the defendants—state actors whom I’ve named in a § 1983 complaint for due process violations, retaliation, and ADA interference. I made clear that if electronic access is not granted immediately, I will have no choice but to add the federal court itself as a defendant in a separate civil rights claim for denial of access.
Of all the officials contacted, only Rep. Foushee replied and asked clarifying questions. But as of now, no corrective action has been taken on either matter.