Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Injustice
Injustice
https://youtu.be/f60Qc15jo3o In this follow-up to Lesson 10: Justice, I reveal how my tenant rights and now civil rights case continues to meet obstruction and bias, which has led me to uncover what appears to be widespread corruption and possible fraud in the North Carolina judicial system - particularly in the Court of Appeals. I take you…
Improper Defense
On June 12, DOJ attorney Joseph Finarelli—counsel for the North Carolina Human Relations Commission—filed an unsolicited memorandum opposing my Rule 60(b) motion, not to defend the agency’s conduct but to justify the Tribunal’s legal reasoning. This filing was never ordered and exceeded DOJ’s scope under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-23(a), which authorizes representation of agencies—not…
Emergency Renewal
On June 13, I filed an Emergency Motion to Compel Rulings and Renewed Motion for Emergency Relief, asking the federal court to finally act on my pending Rule 59(e) motion and Rule 72(a) objection—both of which remain unresolved despite increasing harm and procedural obstruction. The motion also renews my request for emergency injunctive relief under…
No Legal Ruling
On June 5, AL Judge Turrentine immediately denied my Rule 59(e) motion challenging the May 23 final decision, which I filed to correct legal and factual errors, retaliatory framing, and improper judicial notice of unrelated litigation—including an unserved federal complaint that raised serious due process and surveillance concerns. The denial falsely claimed the motion was…
Third Time’s a Charm
On May 30, I formally resubmitted my Record on Appeal along with a detailed Notice of Objection, after it had been improperly rejected twice—without any judicial order—despite full compliance with Rule 11(b) because Judge Osteen failed to rule on the 59(e) motion. My resubmission wasn’t just about compliance—it was about preserving my appellate rights and…