Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Menu

Court Order / Judgment

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings

Don’t Look a Gift Horse in the Mouth

On July 8, ALJ Karlene Turrentine issued an order formally denying my Rule 60(b) motion and my motion to strike DOJ’s unauthorized June 12 filing—without citing a single rule, case, or factual correction. She claimed I “failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” ignoring every legal argument I raised and failing…
July 8, 2025

Read more

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Federal FHA Case Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Friends Over Federal Law

After Judge Osteen denied my Rule 72(a) objection on July 7, I filed a Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, documenting not only manifest legal errors but also selective enforcement of local rules, disregard for due process, and deeper concerns about institutional integrity. The judge upheld every single one of Magistrate Auld’s rulings—including…
July 7, 2025

Read more

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Judicial Misconduct Alleged NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

No Legal Ruling

On June 5, AL Judge Turrentine immediately denied my Rule 59(e) motion challenging the May 23 final decision, which I filed to correct legal and factual errors, retaliatory framing, and improper judicial notice of unrelated litigation—including an unserved federal complaint that raised serious due process and surveillance concerns. The denial falsely claimed the motion was…
June 5, 2025

Read more

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Rinse and Repeat

Judge Osteen denied my Emergency Motion for an Ex Parte TRO, claiming I hadn’t demonstrated irreparable harm or likelihood of success—despite submitting verified evidence and a detailed procedural record showing deliberate interference with my appellate rights and ongoing judicial misconduct. The ruling ignored the central issue: that orders were being issued without jurisdiction, service was…
May 27, 2025

Read more

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Broken Record of Injustice

What happened on May 26 and 27 wasn’t judicial review—it was judicial retaliation wrapped in technicality. In my federal Fair Housing Act case against Anna, Magistrate Judge Auld issued back-to-back rulings that dismissed my renewed motion for electronic filing access and my motion for his recusal. But neither order was grounded in law—they were personal,…
May 26, 2025

Read more

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Judicial Misconduct Alleged NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

A Smear Campaign

On May 23, Administrative Law Judge Karlene Turrentine of the NC Office of Administrative Hearings issued an order that didn’t just deny my contested case—it weaponized my other case in an attempt to discredit me entirely. The ruling wasn't grounded in facts, legal precedent, or the specific procedural violations I raised. It read more like…
May 23, 2025

Read more

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

A Hollow Ruling and Judicial Complaint

On May 21, Judge James Dever III issued a dismissive order denying my Emergency TRO and Motion for Electronic Filing, citing generic case law as if he'd conducted a genuine review—when in fact, he ignored the verified evidence and mischaracterized my claims to suggest they were retaliatory simply because Yopp appeared as opposing counsel. That…
May 21, 2025

Read more