Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Defendants

Rules… Who Needs Them?

On November 21, while checking the docket, I discovered that Judge Williams had entered an order nearly one month earlier, which was about one month after the September 25 hearing. This order was never served, never emailed, never posted in my eCourts notifications, and never mailed to my address of record. I only learned of…

October 22, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff State Court

Off the Record

After the hearing I immediately filed my Notice of Exceeding Authority because the judge’s conduct on September 25 went far outside the limits of judicial power. My notice documented how he ordered supplemental briefing on a motion that was already barred under Rule 12G and Rule 12H and how he ignored the February 17 written…

September 29, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff State Court

Do You Hear What I Hear?

The September 25 hearing was the biggest waste of my time thus far. Not only should it had not happened, but it was pushed to last in the docket AGAIN and they tried kicking out the witnesses unless they gave their full names, which isn't allowed. It began with Yopp filing a “corrected” motion…

September 25, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff State Court

WTF – Seriously WTF

By September 17 the situation in district court had escalated into something almost surreal. I had already filed a motion for sanctions against Yopp for his pattern of meritless filings and procedural abuse, yet instead of the court addressing the misconduct or even reviewing the filings already pending, the judge refused to rule on the…

September 17, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff State Court

Two Wrongs Don’t Make Any Rights

After waiting twelve days with no response to my inquiries, I finally called the courthouse myself. That was when a clerk told me that my Motion to Strike had been routed to Judge Walcyzk and that she was holding it. This was a serious problem because the court already knew she was a named defendant…

September 16, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Plaintiff State Court

Oh, the Games He Plays

As if managing the federal cases and the mandamus weren’t enough, I had to shift my attention back to the district court because Attorney David Yopp refused to take any of my warnings seriously. Every move he made at this point was a calculated ploy to force the federal case into dismissal by manufacturing chaos…

September 5, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants DOJ / AG Office Federal Court

Justice Delayed

On August 7, 2025, Attorney Mary Scruggs from the North Carolina Department of Justice filed a motion on behalf of Administrative Law Judge Karlene Turrentine seeking an extension of time to respond to my Amended Complaint until September 15, 2025. Before filing, Mary reached out to me and I made it clear that I would…

August 13, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Plaintiff State Court

Defaulting to Misconduct

David Yopp, on behalf of Anna De Santis and De Santis Rentals, filed a motion for entry of default in state court, claiming I never responded to their amended counterclaim from March 14. What he left out is that the filing was made after the 5:00 p.m. electronic service deadline and is therefore deemed served…

August 8, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Defendants Federal Court Federal FHA Case Plaintiff Violations

Foreign Evasion

When I filed my amended complaint in my § 1983 claim, I added Anna De Santis after David Yopp’s Court of Appeals sanctions motion confirmed a premeditated plan he had threatened back in February—a plan Anna was clearly aware of. For more than two months, the Durham County Sheriff tried to serve her at the…

July 25, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants DOJ / AG Office Federal Court

Defendants’ Responses to Amended Complaint

Today was the deadline for defendants to respond to my amended § 1983 complaint. Judicial defendants, through Special Deputy Attorney General Elizabeth O’Brien, asked for 20 more days to respond, citing a change in counsel and the service for Judge Turrentine. This was granted despite violation of the local rule she referenced. But the…

July 24, 2025

Defendants

Rules… Who Needs Them?

Off the Record

Do You Hear What I Hear?

WTF – Seriously WTF

Two Wrongs Don’t Make Any Rights

Oh, the Games He Plays

Justice Delayed

Defaulting to Misconduct

Foreign Evasion

Defendants’ Responses to Amended Complaint

Quick Links

Featured Lessons