Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

State Court

Rules… Who Needs Them?

On November 21, while checking the docket, I discovered that Judge Williams had entered an order nearly one month earlier, which was about one month after the September 25 hearing. This order was never served, never emailed, never posted in my eCourts notifications, and never mailed to my address of record. I only learned of…

October 22, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff State Court

Off the Record

After the hearing I immediately filed my Notice of Exceeding Authority because the judge’s conduct on September 25 went far outside the limits of judicial power. My notice documented how he ordered supplemental briefing on a motion that was already barred under Rule 12G and Rule 12H and how he ignored the February 17 written…

September 29, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff State Court

Do You Hear What I Hear?

The September 25 hearing was the biggest waste of my time thus far. Not only should it had not happened, but it was pushed to last in the docket AGAIN and they tried kicking out the witnesses unless they gave their full names, which isn't allowed. It began with Yopp filing a “corrected” motion…

September 25, 2025

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff State Court

…It Does

What happened next was almost impossible to process in real time because of how chaotic and unlawful it was. After filing my emergency motion for disqualification, the court “rejected” it using a form letter that claimed the motion “cannot be addressed as an emergency.” There is no rule, no statute, and no authority anywhere in…

September 23, 2025

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff State Court

In Case You Didn’t Think It Could Get Worse…

What happened next in the state case was another escalation that showed exactly how far the court was willing to go to block my access. The order on my motion to reconsider was entered on September 18 but it was never served, never emailed, never posted to the eCourts portal, and it did not contain…

September 19, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff State Court

WTF – Seriously WTF

By September 17 the situation in district court had escalated into something almost surreal. I had already filed a motion for sanctions against Yopp for his pattern of meritless filings and procedural abuse, yet instead of the court addressing the misconduct or even reviewing the filings already pending, the judge refused to rule on the…

September 17, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff State Court

Two Wrongs Don’t Make Any Rights

After waiting twelve days with no response to my inquiries, I finally called the courthouse myself. That was when a clerk told me that my Motion to Strike had been routed to Judge Walcyzk and that she was holding it. This was a serious problem because the court already knew she was a named defendant…

September 16, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Plaintiff State Court

Oh, the Games He Plays

As if managing the federal cases and the mandamus weren’t enough, I had to shift my attention back to the district court because Attorney David Yopp refused to take any of my warnings seriously. Every move he made at this point was a calculated ploy to force the federal case into dismissal by manufacturing chaos…

September 5, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Plaintiff State Court

Defaulting to Misconduct

David Yopp, on behalf of Anna De Santis and De Santis Rentals, filed a motion for entry of default in state court, claiming I never responded to their amended counterclaim from March 14. What he left out is that the filing was made after the 5:00 p.m. electronic service deadline and is therefore deemed served…

August 8, 2025

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Plaintiff State Court

Response for Dismissal

I filed a detailed Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions in COA 25-521, calling it procedurally defective, legally unsupported, and clearly retaliatory. The filing laid out a broader pattern of misconduct involving both opposing counsel and the North Carolina Court of Appeals, including improper rejections of my filings, unsigned and possibly unauthorized judicial…

June 26, 2025

State Court

Rules… Who Needs Them?

Off the Record

Do You Hear What I Hear?

…It Does

In Case You Didn’t Think It Could Get Worse…

WTF – Seriously WTF

Two Wrongs Don’t Make Any Rights

Oh, the Games He Plays

Defaulting to Misconduct

Response for Dismissal

Quick Links

Featured Lessons