On June 13, I filed an Emergency Motion to Compel Rulings and Renewed Motion for Emergency Relief, asking the federal court to finally act on my pending Rule 59(e) motion and Rule 72(a) objection—both of which remain unresolved despite increasing harm and procedural obstruction. The motion also renews my request for emergency injunctive relief under Rule 65(b) based on ongoing retaliation, including unlawful fee demands, concealment of judicial actors, denial of ADA accommodations, and the use of an unserved ex parte TRO by a state administrative judge to discredit my position. I requested CM/ECF access under Local Rule 5.3 and the ADA, declaratory relief declaring $90 in motion fees unlawful under 28 U.S.C. § 1914, and a court order requiring the release of judicial names tied to rulings central to my § 1983 claims.
The motion documented a series of retaliatory actions by Clerk Eugene Soar following service of my federal complaint—including sudden, baseless fees and threats of dismissal not supported by rule or order. It also addressed the continued denial of access despite my disability, and highlighted how systemic concealment of judicial identities undermines both due process and press rights. I made clear this isn’t about special treatment—it’s about equal access and transparency in a process increasingly used to retaliate against me for exposing misconduct.