Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

NCHRC Interview & Response

Leading up to my interview with Investigator Ronya Bynum, I submitted all of the requested documentation, organized and labeled by exhibit. I also provided a letter from my therapist and a clinical health evaluation to show how the living situation was impacting my mental health.

Before the interview, I was required to sign a statement affirming my responses were true under penalty of law. However, Anna was not required to do the same, even though her evidence was filled with false statements — and ironically, much of what she submitted actually supported my original complaint more than disproved it. Please note, I removed redundant or irrelevant emails she had sent.

This is the third investigative agency Anna has lied to and obstructed. It highlights not only the seriousness with which I treated the investigation, but the disturbing level of bias and tolerance shown toward her repeated misconduct.


Emails Chain Leading up to Interview

Evidence Anna Submitted for her Defense