Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Adding to the Bias Pile

On April 28, Magistrate Judge Patrick Auld denied my request for electronic filing, stating I had to first prove I could follow basic court procedures—despite my extensive experience litigating in electronic systems and my documented disabilities. TEXT ORDER denying without prejudice 4 Motion for Authorization to File Electronically. Electonic filing requires compliance with numerous rules and procedures.…

Read more

Motion to Continue Misconduct

On the same day I filed my federal complaint, I received an email from Mr. Yopp stating that he intended to file a motion to continue the trial and asking what date I preferred. I responded by reiterating that under the automatic stay, it wasn’t my responsibility to propose dates—it was the court’s obligation to…

Read more

Request for Judicial Review

On April 16, 2025, the defendants filed a Request for Judicial Settlement of the Record on Appeal under Rule 11(c), but their request went far beyond what the rule permits. Rule 11(c) allows the trial court to resolve disputes over the narrative of the record—factual disagreements or clarifications about what happened procedurally—not to decide what…

Read more

Appealing to the Court of Appeals

On March 5, I properly served the Proposed Record on Appeal through the Wake County Superior Court’s Odyssey eFile and eServe system. Under Rule 26(c) and Rule 11(b), that triggered the 30-day clock for objections, making opposing counsel’s deadline April 4. I never heard from him, so on Monday, April 7, around noon, I served…

Read more

Motion to Transfer Venue

After I filed a detailed Motion for Sanctions and a Motion for Leave to Reply in the Court of Appeals, opposing counsel doubled down by responding in a hostile, condescending tone—continuing to misrepresent both the procedural record and the law. Their response to my Motion for Sanctions accused me of filing premature appeals for the…

Read more

Sanctions

The defendants filed an opposition to my Writ of Prohibition, mischaracterizing the facts, minimizing my appeal as nothing more than dissatisfaction with “routine orders,” and falsely claiming I filed an amended complaint without leave of court—despite the fact that the court had already denied their motion to strike it. Their response was riddled with misleading…

Read more