On May 30, I formally resubmitted my Record on Appeal along with a detailed Notice of Objection, after it had been improperly rejected twice—without any judicial order—despite full compliance with Rule 11(b) because Judge Osteen failed to rule on the 59(e) motion.
My resubmission wasn’t just about compliance—it was about preserving my appellate rights and calling out systemic misconduct. The record had already been served to both the trial court and opposing counsel back on May 12. What followed was concealment, procedural overreach, and a clear attempt to sabotage my ability to challenge the actions taken against me. The fact that my initial notice objecting to these rejections was also scrubbed from the docket without judicial review speaks volumes.
This Court has not only failed to follow its own rules—it has become complicit in violating them. The denial of access, the manipulation of deadlines, the suppression of filings, and the refusal to identify judicial actors all point to a deliberate effort to prevent my appeal from reaching fair review. I made it clear in this notice: any further rejection without a written, judicially signed ruling would constitute another actionable due process violation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which I’ve already filed and will continue to pursue. After this third attempt, my record was finally accepted.