Foreign Evasion

When I filed my amended complaint in my § 1983 claim, I added Anna De Santis after David Yopp’s Court of Appeals sanctions motion confirmed a premeditated plan he had threatened back in February—a plan Anna was clearly aware of. For more than two months, the Durham County Sheriff tried to serve her at the…

July 25, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants DOJ / AG Office Federal Court

Defendants’ Responses to Amended Complaint

Today was the deadline for defendants to respond to my amended § 1983 complaint. Judicial defendants, through Special Deputy Attorney General Elizabeth O’Brien, asked for 20 more days to respond, citing a change in counsel and the service for Judge Turrentine. This was granted despite violation of the local rule she referenced. But the…

July 24, 2025

Civil Dispute NC General Assembly Plaintiff

Follow-Up to House Oversight Committee

After my July 17 call and follow up email with the General Assembly’s House Oversight Committee went nowhere, I followed up in writing to every committee member—making it clear I will no longer participate in unscheduled, unrecorded calls. Legislative attorney Wes Jones had already admitted it’s “well known among attorneys” that clerks in the North…

July 23, 2025

Civil Dispute NC Governor Plaintiff

Letter to Governor Stein

I wrote to Governor Josh Stein demanding to know whether he was aware that clerks at the North Carolina Court of Appeals are issuing orders—including dismissals—under the false pretense of a three-judge panel. This isn’t speculation; legislative staffers admitted to me on July 17 that attorneys and lawmakers know this is happening, yet it’s being…

July 22, 2025

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Federal FHA Case

Split the Difference

Judge Osteen denied my motion for a 30-day extension to serve Anna and De Santis Rentals—but then ordered exactly what I’d asked for anyway. He claimed my exhibits didn’t prove I’d tried to serve both defendants, even though I’ve documented multiple good-faith attempts, including sheriff’s returns and certified mail. Instead of outright granting the motion,…

July 22, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Federal Court Federal FHA Case Plaintiff

Federal Administrative Oversight Complaint

I filed a formal administrative oversight complaint with the judiciary, following up on my earlier filing with Chief Judge Eagles that was dismissed without addressing the substance. This isn’t about asking the court to rule in my favor—it’s about holding the Middle District accountable for systemic administrative abuse that’s disproportionately harming pro se litigants and…

July 18, 2025

Civil Dispute NC General Assembly Plaintiff

NC General Lies

On July 15, I finally received an email from the North Carolina General Assembly House Majority Oversight Staff Director, Joe Coletti, and legislative attorney Wes Jones claiming they wanted to hear more about my story. On July 17, I received a call from Mr. Coletti without notice. In truth, it was not a call to…

July 17, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Federal Court Plaintiff

Complaints Amended x2 & Notice of Harm

On July 10, I drove back to Greensboro in yet another storm just to file motions that should have taken minutes to upload electronically—if I had been granted CM/ECF access. Instead, it took three hours round trip. I filed amended complaints in both of my federal cases. In the § 1983 case, I submitted a 165-page…

July 10, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings

Don’t Look a Gift Horse in the Mouth

On July 8, ALJ Karlene Turrentine issued an order formally denying my Rule 60(b) motion and my motion to strike DOJ’s unauthorized June 12 filing—without citing a single rule, case, or factual correction. She claimed I “failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” ignoring every legal argument I raised and failing…

July 8, 2025

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Federal FHA Case Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Friends Over Federal Law

After Judge Osteen denied my Rule 72(a) objection on July 7, I filed a Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, documenting not only manifest legal errors but also selective enforcement of local rules, disregard for due process, and deeper concerns about institutional integrity. The judge upheld every single one of Magistrate Auld’s rulings—including…

July 7, 2025

Lessons of Charity