Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Plaintiff

Emergency Renewal

On June 13, I filed an Emergency Motion to Compel Rulings and Renewed Motion for Emergency Relief, asking the federal court to finally act on my pending Rule 59(e) motion and Rule 72(a) objection—both of which remain unresolved despite increasing harm and procedural obstruction. The motion also renews my request for emergency injunctive relief under…

June 13, 2025

Civil Dispute NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

One Last Chance

I decided to provide one more chance for ALJ Turrentine to correct her ruling as it wasn't untimely, didn't require a trial, and wasn't a second motion for reconsideration. I also informed her that her ruling is being used as evidence in pending 1983 claim and will be added as a party if she…

June 9, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff

Fighting Against a Brick Wall

June 6 felt like the weight of institutional resistance pressed in on every front. I filed a supplement to my Rule 59(e) motion documenting new evidence that the Eastern District had improperly disclosed my unserved ex parte TRO to outside parties—an action that became clear when it was cited in the OAH’s May 23 Final…

June 6, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff

No Rest in Retaliation

June 5 was another infuriating example of how process is being used to obstruct rather than facilitate justice. Magistrate Judge Auld denied every pending motion I had filed: my urgent request to strike his prior orders, my motion for alternative service, and both the CM/ECF and recusal motions—despite the fact that the docket had shown…

June 5, 2025

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Judicial Misconduct Alleged NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

No Legal Ruling

On June 5, AL Judge Turrentine immediately denied my Rule 59(e) motion challenging the May 23 final decision, which I filed to correct legal and factual errors, retaliatory framing, and improper judicial notice of unrelated litigation—including an unserved federal complaint that raised serious due process and surveillance concerns. The denial falsely claimed the motion was…

June 5, 2025

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Plaintiff State Court

Third Time’s a Charm

On May 30, I formally resubmitted my Record on Appeal along with a detailed Notice of Objection, after it had been improperly rejected twice—without any judicial order—despite full compliance with Rule 11(b) because Judge Osteen failed to rule on the 59(e) motion. My resubmission wasn’t just about compliance—it was about preserving my appellate rights and…

May 30, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Federal Court Plaintiff Violations

Deja Vu

I had to drive back to Greensboro to refile my 1983 claim and TRO in the Middle District. I also filed a Motion for Alternative Service in Anna’s federal case because she’s actively evading the summons. The address she registered with the state denied any association with her, which is just another illegal act on…

May 23, 2025

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Judicial Misconduct Alleged NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

A Smear Campaign

On May 23, Administrative Law Judge Karlene Turrentine of the NC Office of Administrative Hearings issued an order that didn’t just deny my contested case—it weaponized my other case in an attempt to discredit me entirely. The ruling wasn't grounded in facts, legal precedent, or the specific procedural violations I raised. It read more like…

May 23, 2025

Civil Dispute DOJ / AG Office Judicial Misconduct Alleged NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

Motion to Compel or Recuse

Today, I filed a Motion to Compel Entry of Order before the NC Office of Administrative Hearings, requesting a prompt ruling on my pending Motion for Summary Judgment (filed April 15, 2025). Under state law and OAH rules, the motion should have been decided without a hearing, yet no action has been taken—despite prior motions…

May 5, 2025