Confronting Attacks, Exposing Misconduct, & Putting the Court on Notice

I filed three major documents today—my response to David Yopp’s motion to dismiss, a supplemental to my renewed emergency TRO, and a notice of intent to seek mandamus if this Court continues to sit on my pending motions. My TRO supplement lays out new evidence that the North Carolina Court of Appeals has been issuing…

July 31, 20250Comments ByLessons of Charity

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Defendants Federal Court Federal FHA Case Plaintiff Violations

Foreign Evasion

When I filed my amended complaint in my § 1983 claim, I added Anna De Santis after David Yopp’s Court of Appeals sanctions motion confirmed a premeditated plan he had threatened back in February—a plan Anna was clearly aware of. For more than two months, the Durham County Sheriff tried to serve her at the…

July 25, 20250Comments ByLessons of Charity

§ 1983 Claim Case Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants DOJ / AG Office Federal Court

Defendants’ Responses to Amended Complaint

Today was the deadline for defendants to respond to my amended § 1983 complaint. Judicial defendants, through Special Deputy Attorney General Elizabeth O’Brien, asked for 20 more days to respond, citing a change in counsel and the service for Judge Turrentine. This was granted despite violation of the local rule she referenced. But the…

July 24, 20250Comments ByLessons of Charity

§ 1983 Claim Case Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Defendants Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Motion to Manipulate

On July 3, I filed a Motion to Vacate and for Protective Supervisory Relief after the North Carolina Court of Appeals issued an order on July 1 dismissing my entire appeal and taxing me $364.25 in costs. The order included no legal reasoning, no citation to any rule, and—most importantly—no judicial signature. I believe…

July 3, 20250Comments ByLessons of Charity

§ 1983 Claim Case Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Defendant’s First Filing

While finalizing my response in the Court of Appeals, I also had to address new developments in my federal case. The North Carolina Attorney General formally appeared on behalf of the judges and Clerk Soar and filed a Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss instead of answering the complaint, relying heavily on immunity defenses and abstention…

June 26, 20250Comments ByLessons of Charity

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Federal Court Plaintiff

Emergency Renewal

On June 13, I filed an Emergency Motion to Compel Rulings and Renewed Motion for Emergency Relief, asking the federal court to finally act on my pending Rule 59(e) motion and Rule 72(a) objection—both of which remain unresolved despite increasing harm and procedural obstruction. The motion also renews my request for emergency injunctive relief under…

June 13, 20250Comments ByLessons of Charity

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff

Fighting Against a Brick Wall

June 6 felt like the weight of institutional resistance pressed in on every front. I filed a supplement to my Rule 59(e) motion documenting new evidence that the Eastern District had improperly disclosed my unserved ex parte TRO to outside parties—an action that became clear when it was cited in the OAH’s May 23 Final…

June 6, 20250Comments ByLessons of Charity

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff

No Rest in Retaliation

June 5 was another infuriating example of how process is being used to obstruct rather than facilitate justice. Magistrate Judge Auld denied every pending motion I had filed: my urgent request to strike his prior orders, my motion for alternative service, and both the CM/ECF and recusal motions—despite the fact that the docket had shown…

June 5, 20250Comments ByLessons of Charity

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Rinse and Repeat

Judge Osteen denied my Emergency Motion for an Ex Parte TRO, claiming I hadn’t demonstrated irreparable harm or likelihood of success—despite submitting verified evidence and a detailed procedural record showing deliberate interference with my appellate rights and ongoing judicial misconduct. The ruling ignored the central issue: that orders were being issued without jurisdiction, service was…

May 27, 20250Comments ByLessons of Charity

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Broken Record of Injustice

What happened on May 26 and 27 wasn’t judicial review—it was judicial retaliation wrapped in technicality. In my federal Fair Housing Act case against Anna, Magistrate Judge Auld issued back-to-back rulings that dismissed my renewed motion for electronic filing access and my motion for his recusal. But neither order was grounded in law—they were personal,…

May 26, 20250Comments ByLessons of Charity