Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Menu
§ 1983 Claim Case Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants DOJ / AG Office Federal Court

Defendants’ Responses to Amended Complaint

Today was the deadline for defendants to respond to my amended § 1983 complaint. Judicial defendants, through Special Deputy Attorney General Elizabeth O’Brien, asked for 20 more days to respond, citing a change in counsel and the service for Judge Turrentine. This was granted despite violation of the local rule she referenced. But the…
July 24, 20250Comments

Read more

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Federal FHA Case Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Friends Over Federal Law

After Judge Osteen denied my Rule 72(a) objection on July 7, I filed a Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, documenting not only manifest legal errors but also selective enforcement of local rules, disregard for due process, and deeper concerns about institutional integrity. The judge upheld every single one of Magistrate Auld’s rulings—including…
July 7, 20250Comments

Read more

§ 1983 Claim Case Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Defendants Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Motion to Manipulate

On July 3, I filed a Motion to Vacate and for Protective Supervisory Relief after the North Carolina Court of Appeals issued an order on July 1 dismissing my entire appeal and taxing me $364.25 in costs. The order included no legal reasoning, no citation to any rule, and—most importantly—no judicial signature. I believe…
July 3, 20250Comments

Read more

§ 1983 Claim Case Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Defendant’s First Filing

While finalizing my response in the Court of Appeals, I also had to address new developments in my federal case. The North Carolina Attorney General formally appeared on behalf of the judges and Clerk Soar and filed a Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss instead of answering the complaint, relying heavily on immunity defenses and abstention…
June 26, 20250Comments

Read more

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Plaintiff State Court

Response for Dismissal

I filed a detailed Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions in COA 25-521, calling it procedurally defective, legally unsupported, and clearly retaliatory. The filing laid out a broader pattern of misconduct involving both opposing counsel and the North Carolina Court of Appeals, including improper rejections of my filings, unsigned and possibly unauthorized judicial…
June 26, 20250Comments

Read more

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Federal Court NC General Assembly US Congress

A Request to Legislation

On June 24, I submitted two separate formal oversight requests—one at the state level and one at the federal level—each addressing ongoing misconduct in a distinct case. First, I sent a comprehensive email to the North Carolina House Oversight Committee, House Judiciary 1 Committee, and Senate Judiciary Committee detailing what I believe to be procedural…
June 24, 20250Comments

Read more

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Defendants State Court

Out of the Woodwork

On June 17, David Yopp filed a retaliatory and misleading Motion for Sanctions in the North Carolina Court of Appeals, attempting to frame my compliance with Rule 11(b) as sanctionable, despite the trial court’s failure to meet its deadline under Rule 11(c). His motion omitted key facts—like my timely May 7 notice of judicial inaction—and…
June 18, 20250Comments

Read more

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff

Fighting Against a Brick Wall

June 6 felt like the weight of institutional resistance pressed in on every front. I filed a supplement to my Rule 59(e) motion documenting new evidence that the Eastern District had improperly disclosed my unserved ex parte TRO to outside parties—an action that became clear when it was cited in the OAH’s May 23 Final…
June 6, 20250Comments

Read more