Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Menu
§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff

No Rest in Retaliation

June 5 was another infuriating example of how process is being used to obstruct rather than facilitate justice. Magistrate Judge Auld denied every pending motion I had filed: my urgent request to strike his prior orders, my motion for alternative service, and both the CM/ECF and recusal motions—despite the fact that the docket had shown…
June 5, 20250Comments

Read more

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Judicial Misconduct Alleged NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

No Legal Ruling

On June 5, AL Judge Turrentine immediately denied my Rule 59(e) motion challenging the May 23 final decision, which I filed to correct legal and factual errors, retaliatory framing, and improper judicial notice of unrelated litigation—including an unserved federal complaint that raised serious due process and surveillance concerns. The denial falsely claimed the motion was…
June 5, 20250Comments

Read more

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Broken Record of Injustice

What happened on May 26 and 27 wasn’t judicial review—it was judicial retaliation wrapped in technicality. In my federal Fair Housing Act case against Anna, Magistrate Judge Auld issued back-to-back rulings that dismissed my renewed motion for electronic filing access and my motion for his recusal. But neither order was grounded in law—they were personal,…
May 26, 20250Comments

Read more

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Judicial Misconduct Alleged NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

A Smear Campaign

On May 23, Administrative Law Judge Karlene Turrentine of the NC Office of Administrative Hearings issued an order that didn’t just deny my contested case—it weaponized my other case in an attempt to discredit me entirely. The ruling wasn't grounded in facts, legal precedent, or the specific procedural violations I raised. It read more like…
May 23, 20250Comments

Read more

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

A Hollow Ruling and Judicial Complaint

On May 21, Judge James Dever III issued a dismissive order denying my Emergency TRO and Motion for Electronic Filing, citing generic case law as if he'd conducted a genuine review—when in fact, he ignored the verified evidence and mischaracterized my claims to suggest they were retaliatory simply because Yopp appeared as opposing counsel. That…
May 21, 20250Comments

Read more

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

1983

On May 14, the Court of Appeals dismissed my Motion to Identify the Judicial Panel without explanation, ignoring my explicit request for legal authority to justify the denial. Just minutes later, they rejected my Record on Appeal again—without a court order, without explanation, and without following any proper procedure. That moment pushed me into a…
May 15, 20250Comments

Read more

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Court Order / Judgment Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged State Court

Concealment of the Record

May 12 felt like a coordinated ambush. I had just finalized and served my Record on Appeal, filed a Motion to Identify the judicial panel behind recent appellate rulings, and submitted a formal Notice objecting to the record’s prior rejection—all actions taken in good faith to preserve my appellate rights and expose procedural manipulation. But…
May 12, 20250Comments

Read more

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Court Order / Judgment Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged Law / Statute / Information

Judicial Stonewalling

The more my case moves along in state court, and every time something happens, I have to ask myself, is this real life? Am I living in some kind of water down version of John Grisham novel where the actions being taken are so ridiculous and strange that it goes beyond normal life? Because every…
May 7, 20250Comments

Read more

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Court Order / Judgment Judicial Misconduct Alleged State Court

Denial of Clarity

The trial court has not ruled on my ex parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order under Rule 65(b), filed May 3, despite its emergency nature and the constitutional violations detailed in the filing. Meanwhile, the Court of Appeals denied my Emergency Motion for Clarification and Protection of the Appellate Record, reinforcing concerns that the appellate…
May 5, 20250Comments

Read more