Motion to Compel or Recuse

Today, I filed a Motion to Compel Entry of Order before the NC Office of Administrative Hearings, requesting a prompt ruling on my pending Motion for Summary Judgment (filed April 15, 2025). Under state law and OAH rules, the motion should have been decided without a hearing, yet no action has been taken—despite prior motions…

May 5, 2025

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Plaintiff State Court

Accountability

The day after opposing counsel submitted his misrepresentation-filled response to the Supreme Court, I had no choice but to act. On May 2, I filed three motions—one in the trial court, one in the Court of Appeals, and one in the Supreme Court. Each was necessary for a different reason, but together they told the…

May 2, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Plaintiff State Court

Hearing on Review

On Monday morning, I appeared promptly at 9:00 AM for the scheduled hearing. There was no movement or acknowledgement for the first 14 minutes—even though the clerk confirmed I was present. That immediately raised concerns. This wasn’t a stacked calendar day—it was just my hearing. I knew the opposing party was physically at the courthouse,…

April 30, 2025

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Adding to the Bias Pile

On April 28, Magistrate Judge Patrick Auld denied my request for electronic filing, stating I had to first prove I could follow basic court procedures—despite my extensive experience litigating in electronic systems and my documented disabilities. TEXT ORDER denying without prejudice 4 Motion for Authorization to File Electronically. Electonic filing requires compliance with numerous rules and procedures.…

April 30, 2025

Law Personal

Justice

In this lesson, I'm taking you through my shocking legal battle as self-represented party against my landlord in North Carolina that's escalated way beyond what anyone could imagine. What started as a simple lease dispute has spiraled into fights against the Department of Justice, multiple district judges, the Office of Administrative Hearings, and the Court…

April 27, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute DOJ / AG Office NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

Misinterpretation of Justice

The reason I’ve laid out this entire timeline is so you can see the sheer volume of misconduct I’ve had to navigate—while learning the law, keeping my filings in compliance, working full-time, taking care of two dogs, and constantly trying to stay one step ahead of people who have far more power and institutional support…

April 24, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged State Court

Motion to Continue Misconduct

On the same day I filed my federal complaint, I received an email from Mr. Yopp stating that he intended to file a motion to continue the trial and asking what date I preferred. I responded by reiterating that under the automatic stay, it wasn’t my responsibility to propose dates—it was the court’s obligation to…

April 23, 2025

Civil Dispute Federal Court Plaintiff

TRO & Federal Filing

By April 21, 2025, just six days before trial and with no clear ruling from the North Carolina Supreme Court on my discretionary review petition, I had exhausted nearly every state-level option to enforce the automatic stay and stop what I believed to be an escalating pattern of retaliatory abuse of process. The trial court…

April 21, 2025

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Plaintiff

Supreme Filing

On April 17, 2025, I filed a Petition for Discretionary Review with the North Carolina Supreme Court under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-31, asking them to review multiple rulings by the Court of Appeals that denied my Writ of Prohibition, Motion for Sanctions, and Motion for En Banc Rehearing. The petition outlined how the Court…

April 17, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants State Court

Request for Judicial Review

On April 16, 2025, the defendants filed a Request for Judicial Settlement of the Record on Appeal under Rule 11(c), but their request went far beyond what the rule permits. Rule 11(c) allows the trial court to resolve disputes over the narrative of the record—factual disagreements or clarifications about what happened procedurally—not to decide what…

April 16, 2025

Lessons of Charity