Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Court of Appeals

1983

On May 14, the Court of Appeals dismissed my Motion to Identify the Judicial Panel without explanation, ignoring my explicit request for legal authority to justify the denial. Just minutes later, they rejected my Record on Appeal again—without a court order, without explanation, and without following any proper procedure. That moment pushed me into a…

May 15, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Court Order / Judgment Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged State Court

Concealment of the Record

May 12 felt like a coordinated ambush. I had just finalized and served my Record on Appeal, filed a Motion to Identify the judicial panel behind recent appellate rulings, and submitted a formal Notice objecting to the record’s prior rejection—all actions taken in good faith to preserve my appellate rights and expose procedural manipulation. But…

May 12, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Defendants

Reading Between the Lines

On May 9, still determined to obtain the judges’ names responsible for ruling on these motions, I followed up with another call to the Clerk of the Appellate Court. But this time, the experience was different. I spoke directly with Eugene Soar—the same person who previously sent the anonymous email referencing a “90-day delay” policy.…

May 9, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Court Order / Judgment Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged Law / Statute / Information

Judicial Stonewalling

The more my case moves along in state court, and every time something happens, I have to ask myself, is this real life? Am I living in some kind of water down version of John Grisham novel where the actions being taken are so ridiculous and strange that it goes beyond normal life? Because every…

May 7, 2025

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Court Order / Judgment Judicial Misconduct Alleged State Court

Denial of Clarity

The trial court has not ruled on my ex parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order under Rule 65(b), filed May 3, despite its emergency nature and the constitutional violations detailed in the filing. Meanwhile, the Court of Appeals denied my Emergency Motion for Clarification and Protection of the Appellate Record, reinforcing concerns that the appellate…

May 5, 2025

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Plaintiff State Court

Accountability

The day after opposing counsel submitted his misrepresentation-filled response to the Supreme Court, I had no choice but to act. On May 2, I filed three motions—one in the trial court, one in the Court of Appeals, and one in the Supreme Court. Each was necessary for a different reason, but together they told the…

May 2, 2025

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Plaintiff

Supreme Filing

On April 17, 2025, I filed a Petition for Discretionary Review with the North Carolina Supreme Court under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-31, asking them to review multiple rulings by the Court of Appeals that denied my Writ of Prohibition, Motion for Sanctions, and Motion for En Banc Rehearing. The petition outlined how the Court…

April 17, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Court Order / Judgment Plaintiff

Appealing to the Court of Appeals

On March 5, I properly served the Proposed Record on Appeal through the Wake County Superior Court’s Odyssey eFile and eServe system. Under Rule 26(c) and Rule 11(b), that triggered the 30-day clock for objections, making opposing counsel’s deadline April 4. I never heard from him, so on Monday, April 7, around noon, I served…

April 11, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Defendants State Court

Motion to Transfer Venue

After I filed a detailed Motion for Sanctions and a Motion for Leave to Reply in the Court of Appeals, opposing counsel doubled down by responding in a hostile, condescending tone—continuing to misrepresent both the procedural record and the law. Their response to my Motion for Sanctions accused me of filing premature appeals for the…

March 26, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Defendants Plaintiff

Sanctions

The defendants filed an opposition to my Writ of Prohibition, mischaracterizing the facts, minimizing my appeal as nothing more than dissatisfaction with “routine orders,” and falsely claiming I filed an amended complaint without leave of court—despite the fact that the court had already denied their motion to strike it. Their response was riddled with misleading…

March 11, 2025