Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Federal Court

Federal Administrative Oversight Complaint

I filed a formal administrative oversight complaint with the judiciary, following up on my earlier filing with Chief Judge Eagles that was dismissed without addressing the substance. This isn’t about asking the court to rule in my favor—it’s about holding the Middle District accountable for systemic administrative abuse that’s disproportionately harming pro se litigants and…

July 18, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Federal Court Plaintiff

Complaints Amended x2 & Notice of Harm

On July 10, I drove back to Greensboro in yet another storm just to file motions that should have taken minutes to upload electronically—if I had been granted CM/ECF access. Instead, it took three hours round trip. I filed amended complaints in both of my federal cases. In the § 1983 case, I submitted a 165-page…

July 10, 2025

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Federal FHA Case Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Friends Over Federal Law

After Judge Osteen denied my Rule 72(a) objection on July 7, I filed a Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, documenting not only manifest legal errors but also selective enforcement of local rules, disregard for due process, and deeper concerns about institutional integrity. The judge upheld every single one of Magistrate Auld’s rulings—including…

July 7, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Defendants Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Motion to Manipulate

On July 3, I filed a Motion to Vacate and for Protective Supervisory Relief after the North Carolina Court of Appeals issued an order on July 1 dismissing my entire appeal and taxing me $364.25 in costs. The order included no legal reasoning, no citation to any rule, and—most importantly—no judicial signature. I believe…

July 3, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Defendant’s First Filing

While finalizing my response in the Court of Appeals, I also had to address new developments in my federal case. The North Carolina Attorney General formally appeared on behalf of the judges and Clerk Soar and filed a Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss instead of answering the complaint, relying heavily on immunity defenses and abstention…

June 26, 2025

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Federal Court NC General Assembly US Congress

A Request to Legislation

On June 24, I submitted two separate formal oversight requests—one at the state level and one at the federal level—each addressing ongoing misconduct in a distinct case. First, I sent a comprehensive email to the North Carolina House Oversight Committee, House Judiciary 1 Committee, and Senate Judiciary Committee detailing what I believe to be procedural…

June 24, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Federal Court Plaintiff

Emergency Renewal

On June 13, I filed an Emergency Motion to Compel Rulings and Renewed Motion for Emergency Relief, asking the federal court to finally act on my pending Rule 59(e) motion and Rule 72(a) objection—both of which remain unresolved despite increasing harm and procedural obstruction. The motion also renews my request for emergency injunctive relief under…

June 13, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff

Fighting Against a Brick Wall

June 6 felt like the weight of institutional resistance pressed in on every front. I filed a supplement to my Rule 59(e) motion documenting new evidence that the Eastern District had improperly disclosed my unserved ex parte TRO to outside parties—an action that became clear when it was cited in the OAH’s May 23 Final…

June 6, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff

No Rest in Retaliation

June 5 was another infuriating example of how process is being used to obstruct rather than facilitate justice. Magistrate Judge Auld denied every pending motion I had filed: my urgent request to strike his prior orders, my motion for alternative service, and both the CM/ECF and recusal motions—despite the fact that the docket had shown…

June 5, 2025

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Rinse and Repeat

Judge Osteen denied my Emergency Motion for an Ex Parte TRO, claiming I hadn’t demonstrated irreparable harm or likelihood of success—despite submitting verified evidence and a detailed procedural record showing deliberate interference with my appellate rights and ongoing judicial misconduct. The ruling ignored the central issue: that orders were being issued without jurisdiction, service was…

May 27, 2025