On the same day I filed my federal complaint, I received an email from Mr. Yopp stating that he intended to file a motion to continue the trial and asking what date I preferred. I responded by reiterating that under the automatic stay, it wasn’t my responsibility to propose dates—it was the court’s obligation to…
Civil Dispute
By April 21, 2025, just six days before trial and with no clear ruling from the North Carolina Supreme Court on my discretionary review petition, I had exhausted nearly every state-level option to enforce the automatic stay and stop what I believed to be an escalating pattern of retaliatory abuse of process. The trial court…
On April 17, 2025, I filed a Petition for Discretionary Review with the North Carolina Supreme Court under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-31, asking them to review multiple rulings by the Court of Appeals that denied my Writ of Prohibition, Motion for Sanctions, and Motion for En Banc Rehearing. The petition outlined how the Court…
On April 16, 2025, the defendants filed a Request for Judicial Settlement of the Record on Appeal under Rule 11(c), but their request went far beyond what the rule permits. Rule 11(c) allows the trial court to resolve disputes over the narrative of the record—factual disagreements or clarifications about what happened procedurally—not to decide what…
On April 10, 2025, after I was forced to file a notice of delay ruling on my motion after a week of stalling. The Tribunal issued an order denying my Motion for Reconsideration, but the order itself was riddled with misstatements, selective reasoning, and improper framing. It claimed my motion didn't cite the proper rule,…
On March 5, I properly served the Proposed Record on Appeal through the Wake County Superior Court’s Odyssey eFile and eServe system. Under Rule 26(c) and Rule 11(b), that triggered the 30-day clock for objections, making opposing counsel’s deadline April 4. I never heard from him, so on Monday, April 7, around noon, I served…
DOJ filed their formal Response in Opposition to my Motion to Disqualify on April 1, 2025. That filing deliberately misrepresented both my position and the legal conflict I raised. The DOJ claimed Rule 1.7 didn’t apply because I wasn’t their client, completely ignoring that my argument was about an institutional conflict of interest—namely, that they…
After I filed a detailed Motion for Sanctions and a Motion for Leave to Reply in the Court of Appeals, opposing counsel doubled down by responding in a hostile, condescending tone—continuing to misrepresent both the procedural record and the law. Their response to my Motion for Sanctions accused me of filing premature appeals for the…
According to the rules for contested case petitions, a judge should be assigned within five days of filing, but ten days later I still hadn’t heard anything. When I went to check the status, I discovered that the Office of Administrative Hearings had an eFiling system, so I registered. That’s when I saw that my…
On March 14, 2025—despite the automatic stay being in effect—opposing counsel filed a new Motion to Dismiss and an Answer with Counterclaims, all while fully aware that jurisdiction had shifted to the Court of Appeals. This was not only improper under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-294, but procedurally abusive.
The motion to dismiss was…