Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Civil Dispute

Adding to the Bias Pile

On April 28, Magistrate Judge Patrick Auld denied my request for electronic filing, stating I had to first prove I could follow basic court procedures—despite my extensive experience litigating in electronic systems and my documented disabilities. TEXT ORDER denying without prejudice 4 Motion for Authorization to File Electronically. Electonic filing requires compliance with numerous rules and procedures.…

April 30, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute DOJ / AG Office NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

Misinterpretation of Justice

The reason I’ve laid out this entire timeline is so you can see the sheer volume of misconduct I’ve had to navigate—while learning the law, keeping my filings in compliance, working full-time, taking care of two dogs, and constantly trying to stay one step ahead of people who have far more power and institutional support…

April 24, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Defendants Judicial Misconduct Alleged State Court

Motion to Continue Misconduct

On the same day I filed my federal complaint, I received an email from Mr. Yopp stating that he intended to file a motion to continue the trial and asking what date I preferred. I responded by reiterating that under the automatic stay, it wasn’t my responsibility to propose dates—it was the court’s obligation to…

April 23, 2025

Civil Dispute Federal Court Federal FHA Case Plaintiff

TRO & Federal Filing

By April 21, 2025, just six days before trial and with no clear ruling from the North Carolina Supreme Court on my discretionary review petition, I had exhausted nearly every state-level option to enforce the automatic stay and stop what I believed to be an escalating pattern of retaliatory abuse of process. The trial court…

April 21, 2025

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Plaintiff

Supreme Filing

On April 17, 2025, I filed a Petition for Discretionary Review with the North Carolina Supreme Court under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-31, asking them to review multiple rulings by the Court of Appeals that denied my Writ of Prohibition, Motion for Sanctions, and Motion for En Banc Rehearing. The petition outlined how the Court…

April 17, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants State Court

Request for Judicial Review

On April 16, 2025, the defendants filed a Request for Judicial Settlement of the Record on Appeal under Rule 11(c), but their request went far beyond what the rule permits. Rule 11(c) allows the trial court to resolve disputes over the narrative of the record—factual disagreements or clarifications about what happened procedurally—not to decide what…

April 16, 2025

Civil Dispute DOJ / AG Office Judicial Misconduct Alleged NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

Motion for Summary Judgment

On April 10, 2025, after I was forced to file a notice of delay ruling on my motion after a week of stalling. The Tribunal issued an order denying my Motion for Reconsideration, but the order itself was riddled with misstatements, selective reasoning, and improper framing. It claimed my motion didn't cite the proper rule,…

April 15, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Court Order / Judgment Plaintiff

Appealing to the Court of Appeals

On March 5, I properly served the Proposed Record on Appeal through the Wake County Superior Court’s Odyssey eFile and eServe system. Under Rule 26(c) and Rule 11(b), that triggered the 30-day clock for objections, making opposing counsel’s deadline April 4. I never heard from him, so on Monday, April 7, around noon, I served…

April 11, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute DOJ / AG Office Judicial Misconduct Alleged Law / Statute / Information NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

Dept of Unjustice

DOJ filed their formal Response in Opposition to my Motion to Disqualify on April 1, 2025. That filing deliberately misrepresented both my position and the legal conflict I raised. The DOJ claimed Rule 1.7 didn’t apply because I wasn’t their client, completely ignoring that my argument was about an institutional conflict of interest—namely, that they…

April 1, 2025

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Defendants State Court

Motion to Transfer Venue

After I filed a detailed Motion for Sanctions and a Motion for Leave to Reply in the Court of Appeals, opposing counsel doubled down by responding in a hostile, condescending tone—continuing to misrepresent both the procedural record and the law. Their response to my Motion for Sanctions accused me of filing premature appeals for the…

March 26, 2025