Skip to content Skip to footer
Civil | Mainville v. De Santis Rentals. LLC
A Case for Justice

This page shares the journey of my legal battle that began as a simple complaint filed with the Attorney General's office and evolved over a year into a federal civil rights case against judicial officials in District Court, Court of Appeals, and the Office of Administrative Hearings working alongside opposing counsel and my previous landlord. As of August 2025, the complaint includes 39 claims of constitutional violations. I haven't been able to name all the parties in my complaint because the NC Court of Appeals refuses to release the names of the judges who ruled on the alleged violations.

There is a timeline below where you can click on each of the events and view the documents associated with it. The documents have not been altered other than to remove emails, phone numbers, certificates of service (unless they pertain to an argument), my medical history, signatures, logos, and repeated emails in replies. On some documents, I've added direct notes to clarify the record, while others speak for themselves.

I have been representing myself in these proceedings, which has presented its own challenges and opened my eyes to the fact that what we perceive as a fair and impartial tribunal is in reality very subjective. I have contacted multiple channels for answers and support and continue to face deflection or am straight up ignored, as you will see below. I will try to update this site and respond to any messages as quickly as I can.

NOTE: Nothing on this page constitutes legal advice. These are my personal experiences, positions, and filings related to my case only. If you're facing a legal issue, please consult with a licensed attorney. You can also check out the resource page that has links to some sites that offer legal advice.

Lady Justice

A Call for Action

Call for Action

Sign the petition demanding a non-partisan investigation into the North Carolina court system and support critical reform to restore transparency, accountability, and fairness in our courts.

Timeline of Events

Below is the timeline of events based on my judicial logs, with the most recent event at the top. I’ve compiled everything so you can see just how much I’ve had to manage on my own while working full time. You can use the filter options below to view entries based on your preference.

I’ll do my best to keep this updated, but as things continue to progress, the federal court increases the burden it places on me while revoking fair access for electronic filing without just cause. This requires me to take over 2 hours just to file in person during working hours or pay printing and mailing fees if I can’t take time off from work.

I also have a full timeline log on Google Sheets that I compiled to help stay organized, which will remain up to date and you can view any of the cases online through the court and Pacer RECAP.

*For some reason, my OAH contested case doesn’t show up on the public filings, which is case number 25HRC00824.

Reference of Filters:

  • Civil Dispute: The overall civil case
  • Court of Appeals: Actions or filings at the NC Court of Appeals.
  • Court Order / Judgment: Rulings or orders issued by a court.
  • Defendants: Events specifically involving De Santis Rentals, Anna De Santis, or her counsel
  • DOJ / AG Office: Events involving the Department of Justice or NC Attorney General’s Office.
  • Federal Court: Events or filings at the federal court level.
  • Judicial Misconduct Alleged: Allegations of serious judicial misconduct or abuse of judicial authority.
  • Law / Statute / Information: A state or federal law, rule, or case law cited or tips pertaining to the event.
  • NCHRC / HUD: Actions, delays, or issues involving the NC Human Relations Commission or HUD.
  • Office of Administrative Hearings: Events or filings within the NC Office of Administrative Hearings process.
  • Plaintiff: Events, filings, or actions initiated by me as the plaintiff.
  • State Court: Events occurring in Small Claims or District Court in NC.
  • Violations: Clear, provable breaches of law, rules, or tenant protections committed by defendants.
  • Attorney Misconduct Alleged: Ethical or procedural violations committed by opposing counsel (Frank McGraw & David Yopp).
DISTRICT COURT | ATTORNEY DAVID YOPP
Defaulting to Misconduct
David Yopp moved for default in state court on an untimely, stayed counterclaim, and I filed a motion to strike detailing its procedural defects, ethical conflicts, and apparent intent to interfere with my pending federal case.
Aug 8 2025
FEDERAL COURT | MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NC | Plaintiff
Confronting Attacks, Exposing Misconduct, & Putting the Court on Notice
On July 31, 2025, I filed my response to David Yopp’s ethics-violating motion to dismiss, a supplemental to my renewed emergency TRO with new evidence of systemic appellate misconduct, and a notice of intent to seek mandamus if the Court continues to delay ruling on my pending motions.
July 31 2025
FEDERAL COURT | MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NC | ANNA DE SANTIS
Foreign Evasion
After trying to serve Anna De Santis for the 1983 claim, I found out she is out of the country trying to avoid the summons.
July 25 2025
FEDERAL COURT | MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NC | DEFENDANTS
Defendants’ Responses to Amended Complaint
Today was the deadline for defendants to respond to my amended § 1983 complaint. Judicial defendants asked for more time while Yopp filed a disturbing and distorted response that violates Code of Professional Conduct.
July 24 2025
NC General Assembly
Follow-Up to House Oversight Committee
After receiving no response to my last conversation, I followed up with the NC General Assembly, providing more evidence and reminding them once again of their duties.
July 23 2025
Governor Stein
Letter to Governor Stein
I wrote to Governor Josh Stein demanding to know whether he was aware that clerks at the North Carolina Court of Appeals are issuing orders—including dismissals—under the false pretense of a three-judge panel.
July 22 2025
Federal Court | Middle District of NC
Split the Difference
Judge Osteen denied my motion for extension of service, but then granted it anyways.
July 22 2025
Federal Court | US Courts Administration
Federal Administrative Oversight Complaint
I filed a formal administrative oversight complaint with the judiciary, following up on my earlier filing with Chief Judge Eagles that was dismissed without addressing the substance.
July 18 2025
NC General Assembly
NC General Lies
On July 17, after a dismissive and condescending call from legislative staff about judicial fraud at the NC Court of Appeals, I sent a formal email documenting the violations, demanding transparency, and calling for the legislature to investigate and subpoena Clerk Eugene Soar.
July 17 2025
Federal Court | Middle District of NC
Complaints Amended x2 & Notice of Harm
I filed amended complaints in both my § 1983 and Fair Housing cases—adding new defendants, 12 additional claims, and over 80 pages of exhibits along with a notice of misconduct and ongoing harm—after driving through severe storms to Greensboro.
July 10 2025
PETITION | NCHRC | OAH
Don’t Look a Gift Horse in the Mouth
On July 8, ALJ Turrentine denied both my Rule 60(b) motion and motion to strike DOJ’s unauthorized filing without citing a single legal basis, finalizing the retaliation and officially making herself a named defendant in my § 1983 claim.
July 8 2025
Federal Court | Middle District of NC
Friends Over Federal Law
Judge Osteen decided to choose his professional relationship to his colleague over the rule of law when he sided with the Magistrate Judge's defective order and I call him out on it.
July 7 2025
Court of Appeals | Federal Court | Middle District of NC | Defendants
Motion to Manipulate
On July 1, the "Court of Appeals" issued an order dismissing my case without any legal basis while charging me unauthorized fees. This order was used in the federal case, which is no coincidence.
July 3 2025
Federal Court | Middle District of NC
Defendant's First Filing
I filed an Administrative Oversight Complaint with Chief Judge Eagles after the Attorney General appeared on behalf of the judges and Clerk Soar in my federal § 1983 case, filed a Rule 12(b) motion filled with false citations, and the court still refused to rule on my emergency motion or grant me electronic filing access.
June 26 2025
Court of Appeals | Plaintiff
Response for Dismissal
I filed a detailed response opposing Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions, exposing it as retaliatory and procedurally invalid while demanding Clerk Soar’s recusal, preservation of my full appellate record, and that no ruling be issued without a named judicial signature due to ongoing constitutional violations now central to my federal civil rights case.
June 26 2025
NC General Assembly | US Congress
A Request to Legislation
I submitted two formal oversight requests—one to the North Carolina General Assembly regarding Court of Appeals misconduct, and another to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee and Rep. Valerie Foushee about federal judicial obstruction in my civil rights case.
June 24 2025
Court of Appeals | Attorney David Yopp
Out of the Woodwork
Yopp filed a retaliatory and misleading sanctions motion to discredit my appeal, but in doing so, he confirmed prior threats and provided written evidence implicating Anna De Santis in a coordinated effort to entrap me procedurally—supporting her addition to my § 1983 claim. I filed a motion to disqualify Yopp and Soar due to ongoing retaliation.
June 18 2025
PETITION | NCHRC | OAH | DOJ
Improper Defense
I moved to strike DOJ’s unauthorized memorandum defending the Tribunal—an act beyond their legal scope—and challenged their coordinated effort to discredit my Rule 60(b) motion, while DOJ’s response mischaracterized my objections as “threats,” reinforcing the pattern of distortion and retaliatory adjudication central to my § 1983 claim.
June 16 2025
Federal Court | Middle District of NC
Emergency Renewal
I filed an emergency motion asking the Court to compel rulings on my pending motions, renew emergency relief, declare retaliatory fees unlawful, and order the release of concealed judicial identities—citing escalating harm, ADA violations, and systemic obstruction tied to my federal civil rights claims.
June 13 2025
Court of Appeals | District Court
Financial Retaliation
I challenged the Court of Appeals’ unauthorized fees and retaliatory threats—issued by Clerk Soar without judicial authority—by filing a motion for refund and a formal notice documenting the pattern of financial coercion and administrative misconduct tied to my pending federal case.
June 9 2025
1 2 3 6