May 12 felt like a coordinated ambush. I had just finalized and served my Record on Appeal, filed a Motion to Identify the judicial panel behind recent appellate rulings, and submitted a formal Notice objecting to the record’s prior rejection—all actions taken in good faith to preserve my appellate rights and expose procedural manipulation. But…
On May 9, still determined to obtain the judges’ names responsible for ruling on these motions, I followed up with another call to the Clerk of the Appellate Court. But this time, the experience was different. I spoke directly with Eugene Soar—the same person who previously sent the anonymous email referencing a “90-day delay” policy.…
The trial court has not ruled on my ex parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order under Rule 65(b), filed May 3, despite its emergency nature and the constitutional violations detailed in the filing.
Meanwhile, the Court of Appeals denied my Emergency Motion for Clarification and Protection of the Appellate Record, reinforcing concerns that the appellate…
Today, I filed a Motion to Compel Entry of Order before the NC Office of Administrative Hearings, requesting a prompt ruling on my pending Motion for Summary Judgment (filed April 15, 2025). Under state law and OAH rules, the motion should have been decided without a hearing, yet no action has been taken—despite prior motions…
On April 28, Magistrate Judge Patrick Auld denied my request for electronic filing, stating I had to first prove I could follow basic court procedures—despite my extensive experience litigating in electronic systems and my documented disabilities.
TEXT ORDER denying without prejudice 4 Motion for Authorization to File Electronically. Electonic filing requires compliance with numerous rules and procedures.…
On the same day I filed my federal complaint, I received an email from Mr. Yopp stating that he intended to file a motion to continue the trial and asking what date I preferred. I responded by reiterating that under the automatic stay, it wasn’t my responsibility to propose dates—it was the court’s obligation to…
By April 21, 2025, just six days before trial and with no clear ruling from the North Carolina Supreme Court on my discretionary review petition, I had exhausted nearly every state-level option to enforce the automatic stay and stop what I believed to be an escalating pattern of retaliatory abuse of process. The trial court…
On April 17, 2025, I filed a Petition for Discretionary Review with the North Carolina Supreme Court under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-31, asking them to review multiple rulings by the Court of Appeals that denied my Writ of Prohibition, Motion for Sanctions, and Motion for En Banc Rehearing. The petition outlined how the Court…
On April 16, 2025, the defendants filed a Request for Judicial Settlement of the Record on Appeal under Rule 11(c), but their request went far beyond what the rule permits. Rule 11(c) allows the trial court to resolve disputes over the narrative of the record—factual disagreements or clarifications about what happened procedurally—not to decide what…
On April 10, 2025, after I was forced to file a notice of delay ruling on my motion after a week of stalling. The Tribunal issued an order denying my Motion for Reconsideration, but the order itself was riddled with misstatements, selective reasoning, and improper framing. It claimed my motion didn't cite the proper rule,…