Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Menu
§ 1983 Claim Case Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Defendant’s First Filing

While finalizing my response in the Court of Appeals, I also had to address new developments in my federal case. The North Carolina Attorney General formally appeared on behalf of the judges and Clerk Soar and filed a Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss instead of answering the complaint, relying heavily on immunity defenses and abstention…
June 26, 20250Comments

Read more

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Plaintiff State Court

Response for Dismissal

I filed a detailed Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions in COA 25-521, calling it procedurally defective, legally unsupported, and clearly retaliatory. The filing laid out a broader pattern of misconduct involving both opposing counsel and the North Carolina Court of Appeals, including improper rejections of my filings, unsigned and possibly unauthorized judicial…
June 26, 20250Comments

Read more

Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Federal Court NC General Assembly US Congress

A Request to Legislation

On June 24, I submitted two separate formal oversight requests—one at the state level and one at the federal level—each addressing ongoing misconduct in a distinct case. First, I sent a comprehensive email to the North Carolina House Oversight Committee, House Judiciary 1 Committee, and Senate Judiciary Committee detailing what I believe to be procedural…
June 24, 20250Comments

Read more

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court of Appeals Defendants State Court

Out of the Woodwork

On June 17, David Yopp filed a retaliatory and misleading Motion for Sanctions in the North Carolina Court of Appeals, attempting to frame my compliance with Rule 11(b) as sanctionable, despite the trial court’s failure to meet its deadline under Rule 11(c). His motion omitted key facts—like my timely May 7 notice of judicial inaction—and…
June 18, 20250Comments

Read more

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff

Fighting Against a Brick Wall

June 6 felt like the weight of institutional resistance pressed in on every front. I filed a supplement to my Rule 59(e) motion documenting new evidence that the Eastern District had improperly disclosed my unserved ex parte TRO to outside parties—an action that became clear when it was cited in the OAH’s May 23 Final…
June 6, 20250Comments

Read more

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged Plaintiff

No Rest in Retaliation

June 5 was another infuriating example of how process is being used to obstruct rather than facilitate justice. Magistrate Judge Auld denied every pending motion I had filed: my urgent request to strike his prior orders, my motion for alternative service, and both the CM/ECF and recusal motions—despite the fact that the docket had shown…
June 5, 20250Comments

Read more

§ 1983 Claim Case Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Federal Court Judicial Misconduct Alleged

Rinse and Repeat

Judge Osteen denied my Emergency Motion for an Ex Parte TRO, claiming I hadn’t demonstrated irreparable harm or likelihood of success—despite submitting verified evidence and a detailed procedural record showing deliberate interference with my appellate rights and ongoing judicial misconduct. The ruling ignored the central issue: that orders were being issued without jurisdiction, service was…
May 27, 20250Comments

Read more