Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Rules… Who Needs Them?

On November 21, while checking the docket, I discovered that Judge Williams had entered an order nearly one month earlier, which was about one month after the September 25 hearing. This order was never served, never emailed, never posted in my eCourts notifications, and never mailed to my address of record. I only learned of…

Read more

Off the Record

After the hearing I immediately filed my Notice of Exceeding Authority because the judge’s conduct on September 25 went far outside the limits of judicial power. My notice documented how he ordered supplemental briefing on a motion that was already barred under Rule 12G and Rule 12H and how he ignored the February 17 written…

Read more

Order Required in the Court

After I was told by the court to appear at a Webex hearing on February 14 following the previous day's proceeding, I emailed the trial court administrator to confirm the hearing and explain that I had filed both an Objection to the Improperly Noticed Hearing and a Writ of Supersedeas and Motion to Stay with…

Read more

Motion Hearing Leads to Misconduct & Appeal

This hearing was meant to address my emergency motion and clarify procedural issues caused by defendants' delays and inconsistent court orders. Despite Judge Walczyk being lead civil judge, I was pushed to the end of the docket, repeatedly talked over, and mischaracterized. She blamed me for case delays due to my appeal, ignoring that these…

Read more

Motion Hearing = First Interlocutory Order on Appeal

The January 23 hearing fundamentally shaped everything that followed in my case and the amount of misconduct is too long to list. What should have been a day of progress instead became a shocking demonstration of procedural irregularities. The hearing was scheduled before Chief District Court Judge Eagles, who had sole authority to rule on…

Read more

Arbitration Hearing

During the hearing, the respondents’ attorney stated that I filed a complaint with the NCHRC but that no violations were found, even though the investigation was still ongoing. This either violates the Rules of Professional Conduct or shows they had access to information I wasn't given. I was only given three minutes to cross-examine…

Read more