On November 21, while checking the docket, I discovered that Judge Williams had entered an order nearly one month earlier, which was about one month after the September 25 hearing. This order was never served, never emailed, never posted in my eCourts notifications, and never mailed to my address of record. I only learned of…
After the hearing I immediately filed my Notice of Exceeding Authority because the judge’s conduct on September 25 went far outside the limits of judicial power. My notice documented how he ordered supplemental briefing on a motion that was already barred under Rule 12G and Rule 12H and how he ignored the February 17 written…
The September 25 hearing was the biggest waste of my time thus far. Not only should it had not happened, but it was pushed to last in the docket AGAIN and they tried kicking out the witnesses unless they gave their full names, which isn't allowed.
It began with Yopp filing a “corrected” motion…
On Monday morning, I appeared promptly at 9:00 AM for the scheduled hearing. There was no movement or acknowledgement for the first 14 minutes—even though the clerk confirmed I was present. That immediately raised concerns. This wasn’t a stacked calendar day—it was just my hearing. I knew the opposing party was physically at the courthouse,…
After the Court of Appeals denied my Motion to Stay and Writ of Supersedeas, I was frustrated because it didn’t make sense—why wouldn’t they protect my rights? But after doing more research, I learned that this is common when an automatic stay is already in effect under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-294, because the appellate…
After I was told by the court to appear at a Webex hearing on February 14 following the previous day's proceeding, I emailed the trial court administrator to confirm the hearing and explain that I had filed both an Objection to the Improperly Noticed Hearing and a Writ of Supersedeas and Motion to Stay with…
Honestly, I’m not even sure if I can call this a hearing—it was a complete mess from start to finish.
Before the hearing, I had emailed opposing counsel the contract for transcripts of the other hearing as required for my interlocutory appeal and followed up on the notice of appeal. Although he acknowledged receiving…
This hearing was meant to address my emergency motion and clarify procedural issues caused by defendants' delays and inconsistent court orders. Despite Judge Walczyk being lead civil judge, I was pushed to the end of the docket, repeatedly talked over, and mischaracterized. She blamed me for case delays due to my appeal, ignoring that these…
The January 23 hearing fundamentally shaped everything that followed in my case and the amount of misconduct is too long to list. What should have been a day of progress instead became a shocking demonstration of procedural irregularities. The hearing was scheduled before Chief District Court Judge Eagles, who had sole authority to rule on…
During the hearing, the respondents’ attorney stated that I filed a complaint with the NCHRC but that no violations were found, even though the investigation was still ongoing. This either violates the Rules of Professional Conduct or shows they had access to information I wasn't given.
I was only given three minutes to cross-examine…
