Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Menu
Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings

Don’t Look a Gift Horse in the Mouth

On July 8, ALJ Karlene Turrentine issued an order formally denying my Rule 60(b) motion and my motion to strike DOJ’s unauthorized June 12 filing—without citing a single rule, case, or factual correction. She claimed I “failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” ignoring every legal argument I raised and failing…
July 8, 20250Comments

Read more

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Defendants DOJ / AG Office NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

Improper Defense

On June 12, DOJ attorney Joseph Finarelli—counsel for the North Carolina Human Relations Commission—filed an unsolicited memorandum opposing my Rule 60(b) motion, not to defend the agency’s conduct but to justify the Tribunal’s legal reasoning. This filing was never ordered and exceeded DOJ’s scope under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-23(a), which authorizes representation of agencies—not…
June 16, 20250Comments

Read more

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Judicial Misconduct Alleged NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

No Legal Ruling

On June 5, AL Judge Turrentine immediately denied my Rule 59(e) motion challenging the May 23 final decision, which I filed to correct legal and factual errors, retaliatory framing, and improper judicial notice of unrelated litigation—including an unserved federal complaint that raised serious due process and surveillance concerns. The denial falsely claimed the motion was…
June 5, 20250Comments

Read more

Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment Judicial Misconduct Alleged NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

A Smear Campaign

On May 23, Administrative Law Judge Karlene Turrentine of the NC Office of Administrative Hearings issued an order that didn’t just deny my contested case—it weaponized my other case in an attempt to discredit me entirely. The ruling wasn't grounded in facts, legal precedent, or the specific procedural violations I raised. It read more like…
May 23, 20250Comments

Read more

Civil Dispute DOJ / AG Office Judicial Misconduct Alleged NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

Motion to Compel or Recuse

Today, I filed a Motion to Compel Entry of Order before the NC Office of Administrative Hearings, requesting a prompt ruling on my pending Motion for Summary Judgment (filed April 15, 2025). Under state law and OAH rules, the motion should have been decided without a hearing, yet no action has been taken—despite prior motions…
May 5, 20250Comments

Read more

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute DOJ / AG Office NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

Misinterpretation of Justice

The reason I’ve laid out this entire timeline is so you can see the sheer volume of misconduct I’ve had to navigate—while learning the law, keeping my filings in compliance, working full-time, taking care of two dogs, and constantly trying to stay one step ahead of people who have far more power and institutional support…
April 24, 20250Comments

Read more

Civil Dispute DOJ / AG Office Judicial Misconduct Alleged NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

Motion for Summary Judgment

On April 10, 2025, after I was forced to file a notice of delay ruling on my motion after a week of stalling. The Tribunal issued an order denying my Motion for Reconsideration, but the order itself was riddled with misstatements, selective reasoning, and improper framing. It claimed my motion didn't cite the proper rule,…
April 15, 20250Comments

Read more

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute DOJ / AG Office Judicial Misconduct Alleged Law / Statute / Information NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

Dept of Unjustice

DOJ filed their formal Response in Opposition to my Motion to Disqualify on April 1, 2025. That filing deliberately misrepresented both my position and the legal conflict I raised. The DOJ claimed Rule 1.7 didn’t apply because I wasn’t their client, completely ignoring that my argument was about an institutional conflict of interest—namely, that they…
April 1, 20250Comments

Read more

Attorney Misconduct Alleged Civil Dispute Court Order / Judgment DOJ / AG Office NCHRC / HUD Office of Administrative Hearings Plaintiff

Dismissed by the DOJ

According to the rules for contested case petitions, a judge should be assigned within five days of filing, but ten days later I still hadn’t heard anything. When I went to check the status, I discovered that the Office of Administrative Hearings had an eFiling system, so I registered. That’s when I saw that my…
March 18, 20250Comments

Read more